Perlman, M.D. & WU, L.A.N.G., 2003. On the validity of the likelihood ratio and maximum likelihood methods. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 117, pp.59–81. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378375802003592.

Hu, Feifang & Zidek, J.V., 2003. The weighted likelihood. Quality control and applied statistics, 48, pp.545–546.

Szudek, J., Joe, H. & Friedman, J.M., 2002. Analysis of intrafamilial phenotypic variation in neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). Genetic Epidemiology, 23, pp.150-164.

Gustafson, P., Le, N.D. & Vallée, M., 2002. A Bayesian approach to case–control studies with errors in covariables. Biostatistics, 3, pp.229–243.

Kibria, B.M.Golam et al., 2002. Bayesian spatial prediction of random space-time fields with application to mapping PM2. 5 exposure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, pp.112–124.

Salibian-Barrera, M. & Zamar, R.H., 2002. Bootstrapping robust estimates of regression. Annals of Statistics, pp.556–582.

Salibian-Barrera, M. & Zamar, R.H., 2002. Bootstrapping robust estimates of regression. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 30, pp.556-582.

Knudtson, M.L. et al., 2002. Chelation therapy for ischemic heart disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 287, pp.481–486.

Wolff, J.E. et al., 2002. Choroid plexus tumours. Br. J. Cancer, 87, pp.1086–1091.

Perlman, M.D. & WU, L.A.N.G., 2002. A class of conditional tests for a multivariate one-sided alternative. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 107, pp.155–171. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378375802002501.

van Eeden, C. & Zidek, J.V., 2002. Combining sample information in estimating ordered normal means. Sankhy\=a: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, pp.588–610.

Gustafson, P. & Le, N.D., 2002. Comparing the effects of continuous and discrete covariate measurement error, with emphasis on the dichotomization of mismeasured predictors. Biometrics, 58, pp.878-887.

Gorsche, R.G. et al., 2002. Comparison of outcomes of untreated carpal tunnel syndrome and asymptomatic controls in meat packers. Occup Med (Lond), 52, pp.491–496.

van Eeden, C. & Zidek, J.V., 2002. CORRECTION NOTE: Minimax estimation of a bounded scale parameter for scale-invariant squared-error loss.

van Eeden, C. & Zidek, J.V., 2002. Correction on Estimating one of two normal means when their difference is bounded. Statistics and Probability Letters, 57, p.111.

Perlman, M.D. & WU, L.A.N.G., 2002. A defense of the likelihood ratio test for one-sided and order-restricted alternatives. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 107, pp.173–186. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378375802002513.

Lim, Y.B. et al., 2002. Design and analysis of computer experiments when the output is highly correlated over the input space. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 30, pp.109–126. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/3315868/abstract.

Johnson, D.W. et al., 2002. Differences in admission rates of children with bronchiolitis by pediatric and general emergency departments. Pediatrics, 110, p.e49.

Hall, P. & Heckman, N.E., 2002. Estimating and depicting the structure of a distribution of random functions. BIOMETRIKA, 89, pp.145-158.

Hall, P. & Heckman, N.E., 2002. Estimating and depicting the structure of a distribution of random functions. Biometrika, 89, pp.145–158. Available at: http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/content/89/1/145.short.

Chen, J. & Wu, C., 2002. Estimation of distribution function and quantiles using the model-calibrated pseudo empirical likelihood method. Statistica Sinica, 12, pp.1223–1240.

Baser, M.E. et al., 2002. Evaluation of clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis 2. Neurology, 59, pp.1759-1765.

Harvey, S. et al., 2002. Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care. Midwifery, 18, pp.260–267.

Brauer, M. et al., 2002. Exposure misclassification and threshold concentrations in time series analyses of air pollution health effects. Risk Analysis, 22, pp.1183–1193.

WU, L.A.N.G. & Gilbert, P.B., 2002. Flexible Weighted Log-Rank Tests Optimal for Detecting Early and/or Late Survival Differences. Biometrics, 58, pp.997–1004. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00997.x/abstract.